17 minutes ago, MaxKilljoy said:
Different thing. One deals with an observed action (what people will do, an observable fact) the other deals with an insinuation of motive and emotional state that the person making the statement cannot know ("some people are only happy if" ) .
But nice try.
How, then, should we interpret an outright statement characterizing another's motives and meaning, even in the face of the "accused" telling you you're wrong?
