So I've been pondering a question that affects a lot of us, are CR90B's with SW7 ion cannons better than Vanilla CR90A. At face value the CR90A has the range, but the CR90B can guarentee 3 damage, which is quite a sensational volley output. Pesters the enemies defence tokens and is completely predictable.
However at 44 points which one is better?
CR90B SW7 front arc: (assumes you dont want those accuracies)
3 damage - 56%
3 damage including crit - 44%
CR90A front arc: (all values in percent)
Damage------------- 5 ----- 4 ----- 3 ------ 2 ------ 1 ----- 0
Crit with Acc-------- 0.00 - 0.00 - 2.54 -- 10.78- 6.65 - 0.00
Crit Without Acc--- 0.34 - 6.16 - 16.98-12.94- 1.50 - 0.00
Just Acc -------------- 0.00 - 0.41 - 3.00 -- 7.14 -- 8.38 - 3.23
No crit or Acc. ----- 0.70 - 3.22 - 6.50 -- 6.33 -- 3.22 - 0.00
Chances of getting 3 or more damage = 39.85%
Chances of getting 2 damage with accuracy = 17.92%
Chances of other rolls = 42.23%
So you end up with a 42.23% chance of rolling worse than the SW7, and a 10.83% chance of rolling better than SW7.
The problem I have is this still doesnt take into account range. How many more shots will you get to take across a game with a CR90A over a CR90B? Is that even quantifiable? If your just looking at damage output, I think this favours the CR90B SW7.
Thoughts?
Edited by Ginkapo