As the title states, I'm concerned that A-Wings are simply too good for their cost. They are fast, cheap, have decent health, a 75% chance to hurt a ship, and counter to dissuade other fighters from attacking them.
A-Wings are fast, meaning that they are flexible and forgiving of positioning mistakes. Also,it allows you to use them to intercept enemy bombers, or to have a larger Alpha Strike range. This allows you to engage enemy squadrons on your terms.
A-Wings also have black dice for anti-ship, meaning that they will do damage 75% of the time. Sure, they miss out on the potential for crits or double damage, but that only happens 25% of the time with Y-Wings.
A-Wings have Counter 2, meaning that they pose a threat to enemy squadrons even on your opponent's turn. Their AA of 3 is decent, and combined with Flight Controllers, they are very good at swatting other squadrons.
In short, A-Wings are the most flexible generic squadron in the Rebel arsenal. Their low cost justifies their lack of Bomber keyword, and they are only slightly worse than X-Wings or Y-Wings against ships, while being faster and better against squadrons.
YT-2400s take the spot as the elite generic squadron, but A-Wings are much cheaper and just as potent in the right hands.
In contrast, X-Wings seem wickedly over-priced. They only have one hit point more, one more AA die, are marginally more effective against ships, are slower, and lose counter. For whatever reason, the Escort keyword has been tossed on expensive ships, which the opponent would likely engage first, anyways. I could see X-Wings being good in a sort of, "second wave," wherein Y-Wings engage enemy ships and are then engaged by enemy squadrons. The X-Wings zip in and hammer the enemy squadrons, and Escort prevents the enemy for killing off your bombers. Sounds okay, and like a ***** to concert. Haha. I don't think X-Wings merit their cost. Maybe if they had a black anti-ship, or had 3 AA and cost less, or had more hull.
