So here is a question I'm pretty sure I know the answer to, but I was in disagreement with my opponent and decided to cede to his interpretation so long as we kept it consistent but I would like community confirmation that he wasn't doing it right...
Say in a situation where two dice are rolled at long range on a shield-less ship and they come up crit and hit. The ship uses an evade and selects the crit die to evade - my understanding would be that there is no longer a crit in the pool. In other words, no crit effect is resolved and the ship would only take a face down card.
My opponent was arguing that the die remains in the pool but is canceled as damage, therefore a crit is still resolved (this might have been in no small part because we were playing the objective that gives you 15 points for every face up card dealt)
To me this seems patently wrong, if you evade the crit there is no crit effect to resolve according to the attack resolution stack (evade happens before the damage resolution).