Unless I missed it, still don't see anything on Integrated Astromech+R2-D6

I don't get why its a question. The Huge ships already set a precedent for losing upgrades when losing the associated slots.

The ship cards for the raider do not contain the entire word 'corvette'. So in a strict sense the titles for the Raider cannot be used for them. I don't think we'll ever see a FAQ for this, there has been time enough to look into it. Instead, it is likely that 'corv.' and 'corvette' can be regarded as synonymous.

the cr-90 also can't technically use its titles

the difference there is that they're not normal ships

they got two pilot cards

meanwhile, both the Transport and Gonzati (one pilot card) can both use their titles as per normal rules

Unless I missed it, still don't see anything on Integrated Astromech+R2-D6

I don't get why its a question. The Huge ships already set a precedent for losing upgrades when losing the associated slots.

This makes sense to me.

the difference there is that they're not normal ships

they got two pilot cards

I think this is not a material distinction. The title cards specify which pilot card they go on, just like all other title cards. The fact that the CR90 and Raider have two pilot cards does not change this. Remember, Epic uses all the normal rules for X-wing except where specifically changed. It's not really an entirely separate game, so the rule about title cards in the RRG still applies and if FFG felt that it wasn't blatantly obvious to most people that "corv." and "corvette" were equivalent under that rule, they would have incorporated it into the FAQ/Errata long before now.

Still trying to figure out how Boba was buffed...

I am thinking that previously the navigator crew card didn't allow Boba to change speed when he changed heading? It isn't in red text, so ... I am not sure...

That's extremely old. Do people not realize red=new?

New player here! So how does the errata work for future prints? Is everything that is being re-printed now have the updated text instead of the original language? Thanks!

Unless I missed it, still don't see anything on Integrated Astromech+R2-D6

I don't get why its a question. The Huge ships already set a precedent for losing upgrades when losing the associated slots.

A large portion of players never touch Epic play, so it's still a worthwhile question. I can see two players getting very confused at a tournament who have never faced a similar interaction, and calling over a clueless TO who has no answer either. It needs a FAQ, even if a heavy amount of digging will find an acceptable answer.

Still trying to figure out how Boba was buffed...

I am thinking that previously the navigator crew card didn't allow Boba to change speed when he changed heading? It isn't in red text, so ... I am not sure...

That's extremely old. Do people not realize red=new?

I think people get the red text thing.

I certainly do. My point was that because the text was black, it meant that either the text hadn't changed, or it had changed and they forgot to make the text red. My speculation (since I didn't have the old version on hand to compare) was that if the commentary associated with Boba had changed, it could be the text pertaining to the navigator.

I wasn't unaware of how red text identifies new content. Sorry for the confusion.

The ship cards for the raider do not contain the entire word 'corvette'. So in a strict sense the titles for the Raider cannot be used for them. I don't think we'll ever see a FAQ for this, there has been time enough to look into it. Instead, it is likely that 'corv.' and 'corvette' can be regarded as synonymous.

We'll probably get a FAQ for that once the v1 is released, since it and the x1 title are the real issue.

Still trying to figure out how Boba was buffed...

I am thinking that previously the navigator crew card didn't allow Boba to change speed when he changed heading? It isn't in red text, so ... I am not sure...

If you're stressed, you can still select a red maneuver, then resolve maneuver changing abilities before you turn your dial over to your opponent. Which means if you have Adrenaline Rush, you resolve that to make the resulting maneuver white and your opponent doesn't get to touch your dial. I think that's the buff.

That's they way that they have FAQ'd it in the past. This change just brings the rules in line with the rulings which should hopefully help to clarify things in the future.

It looks more like a rules clean up. Nothing too new, just clarifications on old cards possibly some issues that came up during worlds that they decided to fix.

Absolutely nothing on Wave 8 or the Gozanti cruiser. There is a clarification on one of the new damage deck cards and that is the most recent item on the latest FAQ.

I was hoping they were going to change Daredevil back to a red move so it can actually see some competitive use.

Just out of interest, what's the distinction there?

Originally it was an action that allowed you to perform a red hard 1 turn, now it is an action that enables you to perform a white hard 1 turn and then receive a stress token.

Whilst the current version allows you to perform the move whilst stressed, the original one would allow scum ships armed with a Outlaw tech to perform a red hard 1 turn and receive a focus token as well. This would give the YT-666 a nice boost in both movement and damage consistency. Also it wouldn't be too bad a shout on Boba Fett either.

As it stands now, it is near useless except on someone trolling as Tycho or the one time someone decides to use Oicunn when they first purchase a Decimator.

So I will ask again since I don't think my first post made it up, but with the cards in the errata, does FFG update the cards with the new text on the newer printings?