I guess you missed the conditions in my statement, about authorities choosing what are facts based on evidence. Basically meaning 'facts' are in 'fact' arbitrary depending on the nature of the authority and the nature of their power and how it is derived, and the 'faith' one places in those authorities. Scientific facts are facts because of the amount of evidence culled from hundreds of thousands of observations and peer review of these observations. Verification of facts is always arbitrary. Remember it's always possible that the entire universe and all of existence is an illusion...which really seems like a cop-out to me but who am I to argue against ancient philosophy.
Close, but you're confusing ontology and epistemology. Facts are ontological rather than epistemic entities.