(which is not so much a retcon, rather a continuation, as the Armageddon story ends with a cliffhanger, so while your preferred version of them dying is implied , it's not stated)
But that's my point -- it's a lame comicbook-style pullback where the hero who was already considered dead mysteriously gets saved again in the next issue. It's like Star Trek III to Star Trek II, where they revived Spock just because the audience was crying. And I actually like Spock as a character .. but such "narrow recoveries", in my eye, just take away from the consistency of the setting. And it's not really a cliffhanger when it ends with the heroes vowing to die here. To me, that always was the conclusion to their story.
Though I'm sure my perspective is coloured by personal preferences here; you already know I like my 40k to be "gritty and realistic".
My perception could even be affected by actual existing cliffhangers for characters I like being retconned into confirmed deaths (not ADB's fault!). Though I only noticed the comparison now, it's possible that I was subconsciously aware of it earlier, and feel that this "mirror treatment" is applied in exactly the wrong cases. Rather than using the cliffhanger for an expanded story, they take a conclusion and change the accepted outcome.
the Lions, who only contacted a fellow Chaplain of Dorn to receive the final rituals [...]
Wh-.. but why? Even a lowly Sergeant of the Lions should be more versed in Chapter culture than some Black Templar Chaplain. This isn't the Adepta Sororitas -- these guys all follow different teachings and values!
Eh, I guess it's okay in that it can be overlooked to write a cool story. If it were just this. But it is another point on a growing list of things that "don't feel right", at least for my own interpretation of the setting.
As much as I enjoyed the discussion I had with ADB, from what I've seen so far, I can't say that his stories appeal to me. This is just a matter of taste, though, so not where we actually found our common ground. I'm not exactly what you'd call the target audience for most 40k stories.
Also, the gene-seed of the last battle's casualties are presumably collected by the arriving Templars - if half of the 96 died, it yields a hundred or so gene-seed, which is not half bad
Yeah, but who is going to implant it? Are the Templars donating their Apothecaries, too?
Then again, Lexicanum mentions a "temporary detachment", and if they can spare an entire Strike Cruiser including thousands of serfs (why? the Lions did not lose any ships ), I guess they can spare a few of their ~50 Apothecaries, too.
PS: We've gone horribly off-topic, haven't we?
Edited by Lynata