I've long believed that there should be some form of extended range ordnance. There is just the obvious question on how to balance it within the game. Sure round one alpha strike from across the board could happen but that is where the balancing factors would come in.

The canon is a matter of ordinance, the cannon a matter of ordnance.

Stealing this. A lot better than my huge letters correcting CANON and CANNON.

is it really necessary to open a new topic for .. EVERYTHING..? no offense meant, but these things have been discussed to death, ages ago..

really not trying to be rude here, but the .. how to phrase it..?.. the amount of "absolutes", sure things, new things.. and the corresponding topic-headers by you .. it is quite .. much.

sorry. Some of us haven't been playing since the beginning. I apologize.

I think what WUD is trying to say here, is try the search tool first. It's possibly better to necro an old thread than reinventing the wheel every week.

It's also very easy not to respond in a topic you feel you've discussed to death.

Because what WUD is basically saying is that if you're a new player you're too late to post ideas.

It's also very easy not to respond in a topic you feel you've discussed to death.

Because what WUD is basically saying is that if you're a new player you're too late to post ideas.

Please read again, Dagonet. I assume we are both reasonable people (as most folk here are); there are dozens of threads the last days that deal in absolutes; "X is broken because I say so. fix it"

it's just plain -rude- from here on if follow the train of thought that lead to this/these threads ("I know best", "only my thoughts count so I ignore everything someone else said ..ever" etc)

.. also begs the question why one posts such a thread as those who explain fall on deaf ears and the next thread already is in the making..

.. and it's really 3-4 people that open threads like these on a "astonishing" rate.

I tried to explain that that behavior is maybe not intentional and how to avoid it, giving the benefit of a doubt (in many threads/headers the intention seems to be a mix of clickbait and trolling, but anyway..). I tried not to burn newcomers and I -think- my words where carefully chosen.

should this not be the case I apologize if I come off as rude. hope my train of thought makes things a bit clearer