Eventually, to avoid having 1 topic on 2 being a "What should I buy / why should I" and so...

This is done on some forums when there is recurrent annoying topics.

What do you think about this guys ?

And sorry for my grammar, spelling and so...

Get all of them

or

Refer to this thread:

www.boardgamegeek.com/geeklist/41787/item/920612#item920612

I know this thread on BGG but it won't stop people to start topic here or even on BGG... So a sticky here might help ?

Tibs said:

I think Dietch is saying that we should have some sort of sticky thread about which expansions are best to buy first.

The best way might be to just have a big "compare the expansions" thread, and anyone can just start reading it from the beginning. They way things are now, veteran players probably can't be bothered posting their opinion over and over again on new threads - or they can, and the board is clogged up with those threads. Any big thread like this would turn into a very long discussion, but it would tidy the boards up a bit.

I see, I see. Yes, that would be a good idea. But the first post should at least include that BGG link so that people can see how users voted on the expansions.

Common consensus is usually Dunwhich/King in Yellow being must haves, Dark Pharoah and Black Goat being skippable, and everything else being a decent choice.

I've heard Dunwich, King in Yellow, Innsmouth: good. CotDP, Kingsport, Black Goat: iffy

avec said:

That's about right. I think the thread I posted backs that up too.