I thought this would be an interesting thing to discuss as to me the cost of some cards seem wrong!

My choices are:

Most overpriced = Ten Towers (location) cost 5

The effect sounds powerful and it is but with location discardal more easily available would anyone play this for 5?

Most underpriced = Aegon's Blade (attachment) cost 1

I have been tempted many times to play this out of house as even at cost 3 this is a great card, at cost 1 surely everyone would play it?

I guess if character buiffs are you're thing. Your dude gets killed though - you are still losing two cards in one swoop. I wouldn't call it the most undercosted out there.

To Be a Dragon maybe -which gets you a stand and recursion in one fell swoop. I still think thta one is way cheap for the effect.

I have to agree with Ten Towers being really overcosted. To be fair, if we're talking about the To Be A... -series, I'd say To Be A Wolf is the most undercosted of those. Stag and dragon both have three prerequisites for playing them (Power struggles and cards in dead/discard piles, plus one kneeled character), while wolf only has two.

Some other undercosted cards that quickly spring to mind: King Renly (3 gold for 4 STR, I P, renown and conditional draw ability), Mance Ryder (3 gold for 3 STR tricon King, with kingdom stealing in winter) and of course all of the refugees (make claim soaking too easy, in my opinion).

Castellan of the Rock would still see a lot of play at 5 gold.

Not a big fan of Streets either. Magic got rid of Moxes for good reason...

With streets being 1 per deck, they are fine. I think the environment needs more free, non-limited, conditional reducers, like Summer Port. Income in LCG is too hampered by the Limited Key word.