Panzeh, on 04 Aug 2015 - 04:23 AM, said:Panzeh, on 04 Aug 2015 - 04:23 AM, said:

Celes, on 04 Aug 2015 - 01:44 AM, said:Celes, on 04 Aug 2015 - 01:44 AM, said:

WarTurtle, on 04 Aug 2015 - 12:04 AM, said:WarTurtle, on 04 Aug 2015 - 12:04 AM, said:

They are a game company. They sell little toy ships to kids. Our opinions are not a factor. They SAY they are, but dollars are the only factor. They make ships that will sell...and we will buy everything eventually. We are not populous or discerning enough for them to wisely cater to our bat-sith demands.

People should realize that there is an internal forum where ffg discusses upcoming changes to the game with certain players.

It doesn't matter much if the same 5-6 people here cry about turrets in every single thread on this forum.

Really it's quite tiring to read any thread and hear the same complaints about turrets over and over again. Ffg knows, there's no need to turn every thread into the same old rant.

There's also no need to try to shut down every complaint anyone has about FFG's game balance decisions.

Your not living in reality if you think that anyone has been shutdown in expressing themselves about an issue on this forum.

Posting on an issue is fine and in fact what this forum can be used for. Posting on the issue over and over and over, stating how much you hate XX in every comment you make on this forum, and stating you will continue to complain and make a scene till your demands are met is NOT helpful. That is the behavior at issue here.

The forums have gotten much better in the last few weeks with the painting discussions and all sorts of game play discussions taking hold instead of repeated complaints from the same folks on turrets or fat ships. I'm only posting this in this topic as it is directly questioning if FFG somehow listened to the excessive complaining to change the game.

Panzeh, on 04 Aug 2015 - 04:23 AM, said:Panzeh, on 04 Aug 2015 - 04:23 AM, said:

Celes, on 04 Aug 2015 - 01:44 AM, said:Celes, on 04 Aug 2015 - 01:44 AM, said:

WarTurtle, on 04 Aug 2015 - 12:04 AM, said:WarTurtle, on 04 Aug 2015 - 12:04 AM, said:

They are a game company. They sell little toy ships to kids. Our opinions are not a factor. They SAY they are, but dollars are the only factor. They make ships that will sell...and we will buy everything eventually. We are not populous or discerning enough for them to wisely cater to our bat-sith demands.

People should realize that there is an internal forum where ffg discusses upcoming changes to the game with certain players.

It doesn't matter much if the same 5-6 people here cry about turrets in every single thread on this forum.

Really it's quite tiring to read any thread and hear the same complaints about turrets over and over again. Ffg knows, there's no need to turn every thread into the same old rant.

There's also no need to try to shut down every complaint anyone has about FFG's game balance decisions.

Your not living in reality if you think that anyone has been shutdown in expressing themselves about an issue on this forum.

Posting on an issue is fine and in fact what this forum can be used for. Posting on the issue over and over and over, stating how much you hate XX in every comment you make on this forum, and stating you will continue to complain and make a scene till your demands are met is NOT helpful. That is the behavior at issue here.

The forums have gotten much better in the last few weeks with the painting discussions and all sorts of game play discussions taking hold instead of repeated complaints from the same folks on turrets or fat ships. I'm only posting this in this topic as it is directly questioning if FFG somehow listened to the excessive complaining to change the game.

Exactly. It's the same group of people complaing about turrets all the time.

You've been heard, wave 7 + 8 is for you.

Why not wait and see how it changes the meta instead of still complaining about the same thing over and over again? Now that would be a novel idea, wouldn't it..........

My issue is when the problem is brought up in an unrelated topic.