Btw I love the hotz mat

I have one so i know what Im looking at

Really nice converison! makes me want to do this myself.

What did you use to create the ship cards?

Think it'll be renamed when the official version is announced? After all the aggressor is already in game.

Think it'll be renamed when the official version is announced? After all the aggressor is already in game.

Please don't!

Think it'll be renamed when the official version is announced? After all the aggressor is already in game.

Please don't!

Ask logical questions?

Think it'll be renamed when the official version is announced? After all the aggressor is already in game.

Please don't!

Ask logical questions?

Don't rename this guy

I see an issue with this card. Seems that it isn't a title, nor it is a modification.

It hardly can be a title like it is named, btw. It should be like "Tie Aggressor X1" or something alike.

I see an issue with this card. Seems that it isn't a title, nor it is a modification.

It hardly can be a title like it is named, btw. It should be like "Tie Aggressor X1" or something alike.

One of those times that reading the FULL forum post would of answered this. He already stated its neither, its a rule card that he came up with. Why it isn't on a normal sized card is beyond me, but this has already been addressed.

I used Strange Eons which is a very easy to use program. I couldn't find a blank version of a rule card to do the Auxiliary Rear Arc rule notes so I did use a title blank card and removed the word title!

It looks like the K-Wing may have a rule card for it's turret.

Yes they should still call it an Aggressor, it looks nothing like a "utility tool".

PS: I would be interested if people wanted to try it out for themselves. Just use your TIE Advanced (after brushing off the layers of dust). It uses the same dial as well but the 5 straight is red.

Think it'll be renamed when the official version is announced? After all the aggressor is already in game.

I hope that they don't, but as the TIE Punisher shows, it's quite possible.

And the Punisher's name only conflicted with a ship type in the EU. The Aggressor's conflicts with a ship type that's already IN GAME.

Looks awesome. I love that mini-turret ^^

Looks great. Need an Oppressor, and the Galaxies Imperial ships will be complete.

Looks great. Need an Oppressor, and the Galaxies Imperial ships will be complete.

The Tie Oppressor won't be easy to make. Model and rules.

But I would appreciate it.

I will admit I tried to blend some of the Oppressor into the design by giving it 2 missile slots.

I just have a quick question regarding Autothrusters. How does this work with "Auxiliary Primary Fire Arcs"? At the moment this would only be for the Firespray and therefore the same rule would apply to the TIE Aggressor. Does the rear primary fire arc count the same as the front primary fire arc for this rule?

I will admit I tried to blend some of the Oppressor into the design by giving it 2 missile slots.

I just have a quick question regarding Autothrusters. How does this work with "Auxiliary Primary Fire Arcs"? At the moment this would only be for the Firespray and therefore the same rule would apply to the TIE Aggressor. Does the rear primary fire arc count the same as the front primary fire arc for this rule?

The strength of the Oppressor was that it had 3 Missile launchers while all other crafts only had 2 of them.

Do the Oppressor was the only one that could fire 3 Missiles at a time.

You would need a special rule to reflect this.

But it was also slow compared to other ties, with strong shields though.

And for the arcs: just take the Firespray rules