So you're saying we need to be more inclusive to stabbed children?

That's not how karma works, dude.

Getting killed by Nazis isn't a karmic reaction to anything, even in karma.

Edit: And if you believe in reincarnation (as most religions who believe in karma do) it's fine because you'll get a better outcome next time.

The 4 Different "Flavors" of Karma: There are 4 different types of karma that you are always working on:

• Sanchita Karma: the accumulated result of all your actions from all your past lifetimes. This is your total cosmic debt. Every moment of every day either you are adding to it or you are reducing this cosmic debt.

• Prarabdha Karma: the portion of your "sanchita" karma being worked on in the present life. If you work down your agreed upon debt in this lifetime, then more past debts surface to be worked on.

• Agami Karma: the portion of actions in the present life that add to your "sanchita" karma. If you fail to work off your debt, then more debts are added to "sanchita" karma and are sent to future lives.

• Kriyamana Karma: daily, instant karma created in this life that is worked off immediately. These are debts that are created and worked off - ie. you do wrong, you get caught and you spend time in jail.

It's exactly how karma works.

If something bad happens to you it's because you did something equally bad, be it this life or the past ones you reap what you so even if in your current incarnation you've never done any wrong to anyone you could still be made to suffer for unknown past deeds.

Ok, although very interesting, the last posts are going pretty offtopic

Ok, although very interesting, the last posts are going pretty offtopic

Your 100% right.

Back to the topic, turkey bacon is clearly cheating only pig bacon is real.

There is a player in my area that sandwiches the dice he wants to roll between his two palms, and then swipes his palms across each other so that the dice get randomized that way. Yeah, it's a bit ridiculous and it seems to hit game objects more often than just roling the dice normally but I wouldn't consider it cheating, even if he thought it gave him an edge and refused to stop 'rolling' that way. Because unless you primed the dice in your hand a certain way and barely rolled them/just quickly slapped them on the table, it's not going to matter.

Ok, although very interesting, the last posts are going pretty offtopic

Your 100% right.

Back to the topic, turkey bacon is clearly cheating only pig bacon is real.

*You're

There is a player in my area that sandwiches the dice he wants to roll between his two palms, and then swipes his palms across each other so that the dice get randomized that way. Yeah, it's a bit ridiculous and it seems to hit game objects more often than just roling the dice normally but I wouldn't consider it cheating, even if he thought it gave him an edge and refused to stop 'rolling' that way. Because unless you primed the dice in your hand a certain way and barely rolled them/just quickly slapped them on the table, it's not going to matter.

Ok, although very interesting, the last posts are going pretty offtopic

Your 100% right.

Back to the topic, turkey bacon is clearly cheating only pig bacon is real.

*You're

you know it's the net and no one cares about grammar yes?

This thread is massively off topic, but still running?

There is a player in my area that sandwiches the dice he wants to roll between his two palms, and then swipes his palms across each other so that the dice get randomized that way. Yeah, it's a bit ridiculous and it seems to hit game objects more often than just roling the dice normally but I wouldn't consider it cheating, even if he thought it gave him an edge and refused to stop 'rolling' that way. Because unless you primed the dice in your hand a certain way and barely rolled them/just quickly slapped them on the table, it's not going to matter.

Ok, although very interesting, the last posts are going pretty offtopic

Your 100% right.

Back to the topic, turkey bacon is clearly cheating only pig bacon is real.

*You're

you know it's the net and no one cares about grammar yes?

No.

There is a player in my area that sandwiches the dice he wants to roll between his two palms, and then swipes his palms across each other so that the dice get randomized that way. Yeah, it's a bit ridiculous and it seems to hit game objects more often than just roling the dice normally but I wouldn't consider it cheating, even if he thought it gave him an edge and refused to stop 'rolling' that way. Because unless you primed the dice in your hand a certain way and barely rolled them/just quickly slapped them on the table, it's not going to matter.

Ok, although very interesting, the last posts are going pretty offtopic

Your 100% right.

Back to the topic, turkey bacon is clearly cheating only pig bacon is real.

*You're

you know it's the net and no one cares about grammar yes?

There is a player in my area that sandwiches the dice he wants to roll between his two palms, and then swipes his palms across each other so that the dice get randomized that way. Yeah, it's a bit ridiculous and it seems to hit game objects more often than just roling the dice normally but I wouldn't consider it cheating, even if he thought it gave him an edge and refused to stop 'rolling' that way. Because unless you primed the dice in your hand a certain way and barely rolled them/just quickly slapped them on the table, it's not going to matter.

Ok, although very interesting, the last posts are going pretty offtopic

Your 100% right.

Back to the topic, turkey bacon is clearly cheating only pig bacon is real.

*You're

you know it's the net and no one cares about grammar yes?

No.

There is a player in my area that sandwiches the dice he wants to roll between his two palms, and then swipes his palms across each other so that the dice get randomized that way. Yeah, it's a bit ridiculous and it seems to hit game objects more often than just roling the dice normally but I wouldn't consider it cheating, even if he thought it gave him an edge and refused to stop 'rolling' that way. Because unless you primed the dice in your hand a certain way and barely rolled them/just quickly slapped them on the table, it's not going to matter.

Ok, although very interesting, the last posts are going pretty offtopic

Your 100% right.

Back to the topic, turkey bacon is clearly cheating only pig bacon is real.

*You're

you know it's the net and no one cares about grammar yes?

No.

Then let me inform you, it's the net no one cares about grammar, spelling or the over use of the CAPS key.

And now you know.

There is a player in my area that sandwiches the dice he wants to roll between his two palms, and then swipes his palms across each other so that the dice get randomized that way. Yeah, it's a bit ridiculous and it seems to hit game objects more often than just roling the dice normally but I wouldn't consider it cheating, even if he thought it gave him an edge and refused to stop 'rolling' that way. Because unless you primed the dice in your hand a certain way and barely rolled them/just quickly slapped them on the table, it's not going to matter.

Ok, although very interesting, the last posts are going pretty offtopic

Your 100% right.

Back to the topic, turkey bacon is clearly cheating only pig bacon is real.

*You're

you know it's the net and no one cares about grammar yes?

No.

It's actually..No!

Sheesh...

Are either of you grammer pedants aware that "no" is not a complete sentence?

Again, I think most people have lost sight of the subject matter to exchange banter. Personally I don't think Karma of any description exists aside from a direct result of human interaction. Life is random and those in power have the potential to influence it, with exceptionally unlucky/lucky events happening well within the realms of probablity most of the time. Same with lucky objects, items exist outside the rules of the game unless it can provide a machanical advantage. Practicaly nothing on this scale can influence X-Wing since most of the data is a certain commedity, excluding dice. For games I played previously, such as Yu-Gi-Oh or Magic (More so the former. A lot of cheats in my area), there are a lot more uncertain factors (including deck stacking) which meant that whenever I was in a tourney setting I had to keep a somewhat close eye on what was going on.

To return to the original example the subject is rolling the dice with his hand open with a couple of shakes, examines current faces, gives a last shake then rolls under the perception that it would sangificantly improve his rolling probability. Even if that doesn't come under a reliable method of cheating I would suspect that at the very least it's dodgy sportsmanship to the extent of making oppoments feel uneasy. Is that considered acceptable practice? Is there grounds to change to call a judge over if they refuse to change the way they roll?

Not that I would recommend calling a judge over every hand techique as it signitifies a certain degree of betrayed trust between gamers. the one described is a very exact example of one which I would consider potentially abusive of the system, yet many of the unique rolling methods wouldn't bother me, unless they were trying to obtain additional data on the dice before they are rolled.

Are either of you grammer pedants aware that "no" is not a complete sentence?

Lmao and telling someone to roll "normally" and complain to the TO isn't being a buttface? If the person rolls goofy and rolls bad you wouldn't say anything. Now if the person rolls good you're gonna bring the TO over because you're the expert on rolling and only the way you roll is fair and anyone doing differently and not heeding you're asinine warnings must be a cheater.

Your attitude is discouraging, but let's try having a mature discussion.

See, you most likely missed the part with weird rolling ONLY being wrong if it RAISES CONCERNS about fair play. I don't care how people roll unless it looks like they are trying to cheat. They can throw the dice at the ceiling or other people as long as it doesn't look like they're taking advantage of some exploit to affect their rolls. Is my point clearer now?

And bringing TO's into the situation is -nothing wrong- if you think opponent cheats. Especially after you have voiced your concern to him about his rolls and he refuses to change the way he does it. Also the basic rule of wargaming around here is that when there is a conflict, it's resolved in favour of the one affected negatively by the situation, so, for example, if you think he is in your arc and he thinks he isn't and it's hard to tell for both of you, you don't shoot. But only if situation is unclear or may raise concerns about fair play.

So let me stress it hard enough - it's only when I think he might be trying to affect the rolls by some throwing techniques, not whenever he rolls goofy. There is a difference between, say, throwing dice up or forward and lining them up on your palm and then quickly removing your hand from underneath them, hoping that they roll minimally, reducing the random factor caused by bouncing. For example - it's still prevalent among some competitive Warhammer Fantasy players around here and a lot of people ask them to roll different because it often looks like they're cheating.

Finally - you don't know me, so you might have gotten the wrong impression but I am an extremely polite person and I always try to talk it out. If I end up asking someone to roll differently because I am concerned, I do it politely. If someone raised concerns about me, say, moving my ships with the templates the way I do I would do it differently so he wouldn't feel like I might be cheating. Hell, I would rather have him voice his concerns than keep them to himself and later go home thinking that he might have been cheated! Is it so bad of me to expect same mature, polite attitude?

And with the dice it's not really that hard to adjust - he can still roll as goofy as he wants as long as long as he does it hard enough for the dice to actually roll, not rotate 80-110 degrees in the air before landing motionless on the table 4cm below his hand.

I hope you might try to have a little bit nicer attitude when replying to people. Ridiculing them like that only speaks bad of you, mate.

Do to my high midi-chlorian level I have very small hands and prefer to use a dice cup. Does my genetic disposition to be force sensitive mean I should have a strong minded dice stand in now roll my dice?

Do to my high midi-chlorian level I have very small hands and prefer to use a dice cup. Does my genetic disposition to be force sensitive mean I should have a strong minded dice stand in now roll my dice?

If you are force sensitive, then you should hand yourself in at the imperial rehibitation centre. We can help you with this problem!

Otherwise it shouldn't be a problem. You are trying to randomise the dice and thus the method you do it with is great! (Though I still recommend that you report any force users you become aware of to the imperial rehiblitation clinic. XD)

Do to my high midi-chlorian level I have very small hands and prefer to use a dice cup. Does my genetic disposition to be force sensitive mean I should have a strong minded dice stand in now roll my dice?

Force users are notorious dice cheaters (SEE: Watto V Jinn) so no one should be playing with you and your freakish dice hands.