http://www.descentinthedark.com/2nd/rage/

Just curious, since that's what the phrasing makes it sound like: "Exhaust to perform an attack."

Wouldn't that make it much more viable as a skill?

The "turn" arrow does not mean exhaust - it means "this counts as one of your two actions for your turn".

Each skill with " --> " in it means that the skill cost an action, not that you have to exhaust the card.

When you have to exhaust the card, you can see "exhaust" in the description of the skill's use.

So that means Rage cost you an action and one stamina to make an attack with +1 damage instead of a normal attack.

But you can do it on every attack you make as long as you have the stamina to do it.

Honestly, this skill is a little weak for a base class skill, but there is nothing we can do about that

Honestly, this skill is a little weak for a base class skill, but there is nothing we can do about that

Exactly- while if it granted an extra attack every turn, it would be hugely powerful for a starting skill.

A lot of people get that confused because they played magic the gathering, which used the same symbol. In this game, the arrow means it takes an action to use, and if it taps when you use it, it will say to exhaust it on the card text.

Honestly, this skill is a little weak for a base class skill, but there is nothing we can do about that

Except not use the berseker...

Except that yeah, but it would be a shame...

They're already too much class unplayable because they're too strong or not enough...

Thanks guys. I missed that part pretty easily. Still new ^^