Hi All!
Our group got together yesterday and were having a grand 'ol time crushing rebels and shredding ties. However, we hit a point of contention when it came time to use the redirect token . Specifically, how damage gets moved between shields. Here's the text of the card for reference:
" The defender chooses one of it's hull zones adjacent to the defending hull zone.When the defender suffers damage from this attack it may suffer any amount of damage on the chosen zone's shields (up to the shields remaining on that zone) before it must suffer the remaining damage on the defending zone. "
Now my understanding was that redirect lets you split the damage any way you see fit between the different hull zones (as long as you have shields on the adjacent zone of course). My group thought that it meant you had to suffer all the damage on the adjacent zone, while leftover damage hit the targeted zone.
To put it in gameplay perspective, my opponent had a close range Nebulon B in the front arc of my VSD as well as two xwing squadrons at distance 1. He rolled 3 hits on my front arc so I used redirect. What I wanted to do, was take 2 of those hits on an adjacent arc (which had 3 shields) and then just suffer 1 hit on my front arc, ensuring hits/crits from the xwings would only bounce off the shields and guard my side arc against a 3rd squadron waiting to pounce.
Since the group had been playing it the other way, we decided that we couldn't do that and I took full damage on my side arc (fortunately his 3rd squadron missed ). However, we all agreed it could use some clarification.
In my mind, the key phrase is " any amount of damage ". To me, that sounds like the defender gets to choose how much damage to redirect. If it worked the other way, i would think it would read "it must suffer all damage up to the chosen zone's shield points before suffering the remaining damage on the defending zone".
However, I was definitely in the minority yesterday and could be reading it all wrong. Any have thoughts or clarification on this topic?