I totally understand player caps because of space limitations. I do think if your space is so small that you can't accommodate more than 10 players or so, you probably shouldn't even apply for an SC.
You're not working for FFG making the call about who can and can't host a store championship, are you?
My hypothetical "friends only" SC is extreme, but what's to actually stop a store from doing that? Personally, it wouldn't feel right to offer first pick of all of those spots to league players, no matter how loyal they are to the store, but maybe I shouldn't care.
If I'm in the minority for being bothered by this sort of thing, I won't let it bother me anymore. And next year, if our store gets to host an SC, I'll consider doing something similar to the store in question. That would mean that one of our league players is more likely to win it. So far, some of you seem to feel that that's fine.
I think it's entirely possible you're attributing to malice that which needn't be, and I think it's also in poor taste to go out of your way to be malicious about it in response (with your plans for next year, knowing that doing so would be for selfish reasons, after attributing those selfish reasons to others).
Intent counts for a lot. You're assuming bad intent on the part of a store that can't fit very many people, but then you're showing bad intent with your (joking, I'm sure?) plans to do the same, simply because you can.
Edited by Critias