Looking for tips and commentary on what others think of adapting the Rites and Rituals rules of BC for use as an Adeptus Ministorum Preacher.
A bit on my thought process. There are numerous examples of inquisitors using blessed relics to combat daemons, hexagrammic and pentagramic purity wards holding back the warp in one form or another, and in general items imbued with the light of He who sits the Golden Throne. There is even a rule for this in DH2 where weapons can have the Sanctified trait, though no weapon has this trait other than those touched by the Sister of Battle Canoness and wielded by the Grey Knight reinforcements. I was pondering how perhaps an Adeptus Ministorum agent might go about executing a ceremony to bring about such ends, or others, in a similar way to Tech-Priests that perform rites to appease a disgruntled machine spirit, and I thought of the Rites and Rituals of BC.
This made some level of sense to me as it would seem to be entirely in keeping with the inner secrecy's of the Ecclesiarchy and not all of the Rites and Rituals require the participants to be psykers. They do require some level of forbidden lore, typically daemonology. My thought was to substitute this for Forbidden Lore (Occult) or perhaps (Numerology) in the case of the hexgrammic/pentagramic wards, thus requiring training in the exercise of such activities. The rite/ritual would still require some level of setup and circumstance, the right components, even utilizing rules like wrought for purpose, but to the end of the Imperium rather than chaos.
Obviously we're not going to be summoning the Custodes, or notable Saints, as one might summon a bloodletter. At least not without DIRE consequences, but this would perhaps allow for another creative avenue for characters? I'm thinking an actual use to the Sanctified trait or an autoseance ala Eisenhorn? The latter clearly requires some level of psyker but you get the idea.
I'm open to thoughts and criticism on this. Would it be a waste of time to players? Too much fluff with too little gain? Too close to outright heresy? Or, as I like to think, just the right amount.
Has anything like this ever been covered by other source books from DH1? I certainly don't own all of them, but I haven't come across anything like this yet.
Edited by jjjetplane209