This is a deck idea I 've just come up with based on a synergy between Gondor and Rohan. The deck is designed from a two / three players perspective, though, I suppose, it would also hold its own even solo in combat-heavy quests. Any criticism is, as always, welcome:
The Hammer and the Anvil (a.k.a. The Alliance)
-Starting threat 28-
Heroes (3)
Beregond
Eomer
Theodred
Allies (22)
3 Gondorian Spearman
3 Defender of Rammas
3 Westfold Outrider
Faramir
3 Snowbourn Scout
3 Errand-rider
3 Gandalf (CS)
3 Envoy of Pelargir
Events (12)
3 Feint
3 Quick Strike
3 Behind Strong Walls
3 Sneak Attack
Attachments (16)
Horn of Gondor
2 Spear of the Citadel
3 Gondorian Shield
2 Rohan Warhorse
2 Firefoot
3 Steward of Gondor
Celebrian's Stone
2 Heir of Mardil
A few points:
1. I only have a single copy of Celebrian's Stone and Horn of Gondor in my collection and I dislike proxies, hence the existence of only one of them in my deck.
2. The deck is low in the draw aspect (only Gandalf and Sneak Attack are there), but I opted not to use Valiant Sacrifice. One resource (even though the deck provides resources aplenty) for a net quantity of one card doesn't strike as a bargain to me, even though it might serve its purpose in a deck weak in draw with allies leaving play constantly such as this.
3. I do not think that cards that emphasize the collaboration between the two factions, such as Mutual Accord, while thematic, add anything noteworthy to the deck. Guthlaf might have been handy, but I do not have him. Concerning chump blocking, I do not have Squire of the Citadel either. More than enough chump blockers are present in the deck though.
4. Concerning the Attachments, the plan is for Beregond to have a Spear of the Citadel and a Gondorian Shield attached (the extra copy of the Spear will probably go to a Gondorian Spearman, while extra copies of the Shield will go to other players' heroes), Eomer to have Firefoot and the first Rohan Warhorse I draw and Theodred to have Heir of Mardil, Celebrian's Stone and either the second Rohan Warhorse or Horn of Gondor, whichever comes first (or maybe just the second Warhorse, since the Horn might be more helpful attached to another player's hero, since my deck is quite strong in the economic department anyway). Steward of Gondor will probably go to Beregond for thematic reasons, even though it would have been better to be attached to Eomer, since the latter will be less exposed to enemy aggression than the former.
5. While, on first sight, Beregond and Eomer might look like an uneven match, since the latter hungers for weak defenders to shine, in reality this is not the case. For this deck to deliver, I want to harm at least a couple of enemies each turn and sacrificing two allies each turn doesn't seem like a smart strategy to me. Hence the addition of Beregond. He's going to take care of one enemy, a destined to die ally another and then Eomer, coupled with Firefoot and the Rohan Warhorse (with the possible aid of Theodred and the Outrider) will enter the killing spree it's expected of him. Not to mention that Beregond's sentinel status might prove extremely useful in protecting vulnerable teammates.
6. For a deck not built exclusively for defense, but rather for a hammer and anvil strategy, is the inclusion of a third Gondorian Shield an exaggeration? I included a third copy since my draw is poor and it's always nice to have one on Beregond, so a third copy maximizes my possibilities to get it.
Your thoughts?