Guys. No one is arguing the rationale behind the ship or the dial, no one is saying the dial doesn't make sense from a background perspective, I haven't even seen anyone claim the dial or ship isn't good. It's just that people are perturbed because the name and the gap in ship roles created an expectation that wasn't met.
We've addressed this already, several times over
"Interceptor" is a generic and ultimately vague term, the quality of specific interceptors are going to vary. The M3-A is an out-dated interceptor and really can't be held to the same standards or meet the same expectations as the imperial and rebel ones. This much should have been evident the moment the ship's name was revealed and everyone curious gained the ability to google it (not a huge EU guy, so that's how I found out).
As for the gap in ship roles, again S&V's Tie interceptor analog is the Aggressor. If that isn't enough, consider perhaps the fact that an interceptor might not be necessary whether or not it was expected. After all, I have rarely seen any rebels field their A-wings when there are so many boring turrets to roll with.
Edited by ficklegreendice