No Scyk Interceptor Preview?

By gundamv, in X-Wing

The first preview was on the 20th of October

The second 2 weeks later

The third 3 weeks after the second

It's been 3 weeks since the third, no preview.

I see a pattern here, but I don't think anybody's going to like it....

2^n ?

Ok, not that grim, it's just an arithmetic progression (2,3,4 weeks).

What I'm worried about is that this may push the announcement for wave 7 and Imperial Epic to February 2015... :(

You mean just like last year? Although the Transport got it's first preview at the end of January.

I looked at the post history and they had plenty of posts both in December 2013 and in January 2014. So far we have only one, related to kits.

I made my prediction in the huge ship thread based on 2-week interval spoilers, but it looks like they're saving for a Scyk Christmas. Early January for the Aggressor, end of January for whatever's next.

Five auto blasters might be funny.

I kinda wanna read the "Mangler cannon" Card too.

Yeah, but only if it's 13 points, which I'm not counting on. It's a TIE fighter that trades a hull for shield and gains target lock. I think that's worth a 2 point jump.

They were clearly trying to up article postings, with all the guest articles. We didn't exactly get a lot of previews. We did get the first preview for the Tantive and Wave IV in Feb, which is about the same as announcements. Expecting an announcement early than February is kind of silly, since I don't expect a release earlier than May anyway.

I imagine one will be soon as wave 6 just went "On the boat".

Ok, not that grim, it's just an arithmetic progression (2,3,4 weeks).

it's either n:

1, 2, 3, 4

or 2^n (starting at 0, I know):

1, 2, 4, 8

or n!:

1, 2, 6, 24

since we have only the first 2 intervals as data, all 3 are still possible.

Edited by Mu0n

Ok, not that grim, it's just an arithmetic progression (2,3,4 weeks).

it's either n:

1, 2, 3, 4

or 2^n (starting at 0, I know):

1, 2, 4, 8

or n!:

1, 2, 6, 24

since we have only the first 2 intervals as data, all 3 are still possible.

If you really want to get technical, the interval series starts with 2,3,x, where we know x > 3

If you take into account dates and start at 1, you have 1 3 6, ...

1 + 2^n could fit into the series interval.

I really don't have anything better to do, do I?

You are missing quantum mechanics in there.

It could be 1, 2, 3, -1, -2, -3

That review is already posted, and not posted at the same time.

They probably are taking off for the holidays soonish, so I would not count on it.

no, no, no, you have to combine spins with Clebsch-Gordan tables...

You are missing quantum mechanics in there.

It could be 1, 2, 3, -1, -2, -3

That review is already posted, and not posted at the same time.

Then it's also affected by how often I check for it. Sorry everybody!

I imagine one will be soon as wave 6 just went "On the boat".

Well? ;-)