X-wings are 7.52% wasn't as bad as I expected it to be, and it's only 4ish % lower than the B-wing.

I'm adding code now to build a nested doughnut graph for ships & pilots ... prepare to see a lot of bandits and talas.

Hmmm, YT-1300s are only 7.62% of ships taken. Obviously underpowered and in need of a buff!

Hmmm, YT-1300s are only 7.62% of ships taken. Obviously underpowered and in need of a buff!

Considering you can only really run 1-2 usually that's not surprising.

this is why juggler prefers to see these totals by points instead of ship counts.

Hmmm, YT-1300s are only 7.62% of ships taken. Obviously underpowered and in need of a buff!

Considering you can only really run 1-2 usually that's not surprising.

*Comic sans font for sarcasm

Hmmm, YT-1300s are only 7.62% of ships taken. Obviously underpowered and in need of a buff!

Considering you can only really run 1-2 usually that's not surprising.

*Comic sans font for sarcasm

Oh, that's why my revulsion kicked in.

aaaand I just finished the last one.

added chart for pilot-ship

I clicked on the link to help out, but...

That's pretty amazing.

This is awesome to be able to break it up like this. Thanks for putting the work in to code and display this in a coherent language for all of us, and thanks to FFG's support in providing and scanning the lists. I got a bunch of lists while I was inputting them that had TIE Defenders in them, and I was hoping for higher numbers, even thought they didn't make the top 16 if I recall. It was nice to see them at least represented.

Darn you interwebs, now I have no excuse but to write a script to to compile all of that data!!!

charts page updated with breakout of upgrades. there's some weird highcharts that isn't filling out all the pie - hovering your mouse over it fixes it.

VI was the most popular upgrade - 9.7% of all upgrades were it. EPTs were the most popular upgrade type - 26.93%.

Great job everyone !!!

I would like to suggest, now that all of the entries are completed, to modify the OP, and place a new link which simply leads to the top page of the site.

I would actually like to see the breakdown by points.

Yep, it is next on the todoi list!

took me a while, but better late then never ...

http://lists.starwarsclubhouse.com/charts now shows totals by sum of points, and by total count of ships.

there's the falcon numbers I was expecting!

there's the falcon numbers I was expecting!

It gets better when you start weighting it by success and cut to Top 32 too. I'll see about finishing up my scripts to analyze it.

I have too many X-wing scripts going on.

took me a while, but better late then never ...

http://lists.starwarsclubhouse.com/charts now shows totals by sum of points, and by total count of ships.

Thanks for making the effort, but I don't see a significant shift in the numbers that would lead us to different inferences than the ship-count numbers would.

I posted this on the covenant page, but I believe you missed my list in Flight 2. I believe I was #37 (there is a gap there).

Matt Kreideweis

Rebel - 100pts

Wes Jansen 29

+Veteran Instincts 1

+R3-A2 2

Wedge Antillies 29

+Predator 3

Luke Skywalker 28

+Opportunist 4

+R2-D2 4

took me a while, but better late then never ...

http://lists.starwarsclubhouse.com/charts now shows totals by sum of points, and by total count of ships.

Thanks for making the effort, but I don't see a significant shift in the numbers that would lead us to different inferences than the ship-count numbers would.

I like both - although point totals are more useful. Fat Falcons cost more than TIE Fighters.

thanks matt - will make sure its there.

PS: didn't we play at worlds? I was rocking the roark+cracken+2b list

took me a while, but better late then never ...

http://lists.starwarsclubhouse.com/charts now shows totals by sum of points, and by total count of ships.

Thanks for making the effort, but I don't see a significant shift in the numbers that would lead us to different inferences than the ship-count numbers would.

I like both - although point totals are more useful. Fat Falcons cost more than TIE Fighters.

That much is obvious. I'm actually surprised that the proportional numbers by frequency and point value are as close to each other as they are.

But what are the inferences that we can make from the one, that we couldn't make from the other? I think there were a few debates last week (I can't remember specifics) in which people countered that the inferences being made were invalid because the data was based on frequency rather than point value.

http://lists.starwarsclubhouse.com/charts now has a filter for top-32 only.