I don't insist on it being the "One Truth".
Then you might want to have rephrased your sentences where you say, at the top of this page, that the communications system are "NOT WiFi" and Star Wars is "NOT an Information Society". Those are statements of supposed fact, not opinion.
They are indeed statements of fact. And as twice stated explicitly, I am writing a reply from GM to our player who is trying to impose their assumptions about technology onto the Star Wars setting. The post you quote above about "NOT an Information Society" begins at the very first line with:
"I explain things to players who expect it to be as follows:"
Ah, I wasn't quoting that post (bottom of page 1), I never saw it. I was referring to the next one (top of page 2), which yes, I then took out of context (a context I wasn't aware of). So, sorry for the confusion. It was the absolute certainty that captured my attention.
I must say, the whole "WiFi" parsing precision seems disingenuous to the purpose of the conversation. The mechanics are entirely irrelevant to the function as it relates to being able to establish remote communications, especially in the context of how this all relates to an RPG.
R2D2 can't connect wirelessly to control the trash compactor for the reason I gave above: because of security protocols, this is almost impossible to do anyway, almost all hacking requires being on the inside. It's not necessary to explain it as an artifact of the absence of wireless communications in the SW universe.
Now who is saying what is and isn't? The argument above is a logical fallacy, namely absence of evidence being taken as evidence of absence. Ironic given the imprecation of such being the main charge you are levelling at me.
Fine, with greater precision: "R2D2 might not have been able to..." etc.