I'm assuming the charts are going by numbers used, rather than points spent, correct? Otherwise Chardaan screws things up a bit.

Both. I don't see why Refit messes anything up though. Prototype A-wings cost 15 points with it, and that's about what they are worth.

Eventually we'll get all of the individual matchups loaded in as well, but it's labor intensive. Right now I just have the final swiss rankings loaded in, but no W/L.

Well, if you do the chart by points, the negative cost of Chardaan sort of screws some stuff up when you get to comparing Upgrades.

Pilot stats for Worlds 2014 has been updated, see the 2nd post here:

http://community.fantasyflightgames.com/index.php?/topic/125842-2014-worlds-results/#entry1313343

The three % columns (for both all squads and Top 32 only) are:

1. equal weighting (if you bring it, it counts the same as everyone else even if you lose all your games)
2. Weighting #1 that is fairly "gradual": weighting = attendance - placement
3. Weighting #2 that is "top heavy" (old method): weighting = attendance / placement

TIE Fighters, TIE Phantoms, Z-95s, and YT-1300 all had effectiveness coefficients greater than 1: the top-heavy weighting (weighting #2) was higher than weighting #1, which in turn was higher than equal weighting.

The HWK-290 had a weighting #1 greater than equal weighting, but weighting #2 was lower than equal weighting.

The remaining 11 ships all had purely negative effectiveness coefficients: weightings #2 and #1 were less than their equal weighting.

The results in the Top 32 generally matched the results looking at all of the squads.