STAR WARS REBELS ship screen captures

By gabe69velasquez, in X-Wing Off-Topic

15415556876_72f727cedf_b.jpg 15438634815_883745bcb3_b.jpg 15438634505_0d8d286695_b.jpg 15251861799_cf7b12f25f_b.jpg 15438289312_e35d125eec_b.jpg 15415556346_41efafb1f8_b.jpg

15435437031_2cfb123001_b.jpg 15251927120_c6e2a8f996_b.jpg 15252027308_da9c9e6426_o.gif 15435634651_25af21c39a_o.jpg 15251927880_1b28a1e958_o.gif

Edited by gabe69velasquez
15252026628_f5b1a1d5fd_o.jpg 15251926780_b2220ce7a3_o.jpg 15252026898_4321778b41_o.jpg 15438831125_12c42ac164_o.jpg Edited by gabe69velasquez

Fantastic! Ghost wave 7? ^__^

It's official, I DO have a problem with those ISD "Giraffe" class destroyers.

The rest looks nice...

My only beef thus far are the star destroyer. It's entirely wrong. And, no, that is not a Victory -class.

The necks are too long, and the hangar bays are off.

gaah.gif

But, I'm probably the only ....

Oh, I see Jehan Menasis has a beef too.

Lasers have recoil? :blink:

That's very implausible.

I watched the whole thing and I kept thinking "Wow, Disney's animation standards have really slid on this one".

Did they even spring for a person to match up the animation with the spoken dialogue... It's almost like watching a translated movie the dubbing is so off.

And the Wookies were hairy but had no texture. It was like watching tall brown cylinders that growled....

My only beef thus far are the star destroyer. It's entirely wrong. And, no, that is not a Victory -class.

The necks are too long, and the hangar bays are off.

gaah.gif

But, I'm probably the only ....

Oh, I see Jehan Menasis has a beef too.

The pudgy TIEs don't bother you?

15439205385_bce5e5e157_o.gif

I think this miniature is going to look deadly. 360 HCL turret without needing a title card.

Lasers have recoil? :blink:

That's very implausible.

If I remember correctly the turbolasers did the same thing in the original trilogy.

If you want to get technical, at the speed that light travels, should we even be able to follow the bursts.

15252726700_96dffa5b2d_o.gif

Edited by gabe69velasquez

Lasers have recoil? :blink:

That's very implausible.

I think you mistake what you're seeing as 'lasers'. Blasters are not lasers. But which are you specifically looking at?

My only beef thus far are the star destroyer. It's entirely wrong. And, no, that is not a Victory -class.

The necks are too long, and the hangar bays are off.

gaah.gif

The pudgy TIEs don't bother you?

They haven't... but maybe they will now that you've pointed them out to me.

I think we need to live with the notion that there's a certain... impressionism? to this series.

Edited by Mikael Hasselstein

Personally, I'm pleased as punch with the Gozanti cruiser variant - looks much better in practice than I expected (LOVE the view of it from underneath, entering the ISD hangar).

VERY MUCH hope we get that as the Imperial 'huge' in X-Wing!

15251927880_1b28a1e958_o.gif

This is the one I saw that I objected to.

Note the recoil before the shot?

Edited by Sergovan

I believe it's based off of the Ralph McQuarrie concept art.

RSpnMnb.jpg

Means the Y-wings will probably look like this:

gZSz8sE.jpg

The Episode 4 and 5 concept art looks very different to the final project: the AT-ATs and Snowspeeders for example changed hugely between concept and production. RotJ stuff is pretty much unchanged though: Prototype Pilot's art is the Ralph McQuarrie concept picture.

This is the one I saw that I objected to.

Do you object to this?



The actual in-universe reason is that they're not actually lasers, they're blasters: they shoot plasma.

Edited by TIE Pilot

Oh the pain! Those Giraffe Destroyers, and Tie Obeses kill my eyes!

If we get the Ghost , it's probably going to be a Decimator size-range model. And I imagine that we would get a Gozanti, too. :) And, yes, like the Clone Wars, things will look a little different then what we're used to. But Artoo and Threepio look a wee bit different in the prequels, so everyone should survive this as well.

Edited by Sel Antilles

It's official, I DO have a problem with those ISD "Giraffe" class destroyers.

The rest looks nice...

Actually I don't have a problem with the ISD look. The one shown in Rebels is at least 5 years older than the ones we're familiar with from the movies. The way I look at it is the newer models have either 1: had a refit or 2: a redesign to the newer look. As an example, let's take a look at a US battleship before and after a refit:

USS_Arizona_%28BB-39%29_-_1920.jpg

USS Arizona, 1920

h57663.jpg

USS Arizona, 1930's

Same ship, different look.

I actually enjoyed the art style, because of how much it reminded me of Ralph McQuarrie's work. Not just the designs, but in the color choices for certain scenes.

The Imperial Giraffe -class Star Destroyers don't really bother me much. They're inspired by this:

tumblr_m3iew9oLiK1qdbhwwo4_1280.jpg

I can see Giraffe -class totally sticking.

Actually I don't have a problem with the ISD look. The one shown in Rebels is at least 5 years older than the ones we're familiar with from the movies. The way I look at it is the newer models have either 1: had a refit or 2: a redesign to the newer look.

That's a good way to rationalize it, and since the EU is gone, the earlier explanation of the difference between the Devastator from ANH model and the Avenger model from ESB, is no longer canon.

I just wish that that earlier material hadn't been purged just in order to stick to the McQuarrie imagery over and above the movie versions of things. I just don't see the added value.

Actually I don't have a problem with the ISD look. The one shown in Rebels is at least 5 years older than the ones we're familiar with from the movies. The way I look at it is the newer models have either 1: had a refit or 2: a redesign to the newer look. As an example, let's take a look at a US battleship before and after a refit:

Same ship, different look.

I was *just* about to post the same thing.

The 'command tower' for ships gets updated regularly - the thing is DESIGNED to be easily replace and upgraded over time.

CVN-65 from 1960s:

Carrier.jpg

...same ship, after refit:

USS_Enterprise_CVN65_1.jpg

I was *just* about to post the same thing.

The 'command tower' for ships gets updated regularly - the thing is DESIGNED to be easily replace and upgraded over time.

CVN-65 from 1960s:

Carrier.jpg

...same ship, after refit:

USS_Enterprise_CVN65_1.jpg

Same thing can be said about the TIE's from Rebels and the X-Wings of Episode 7. Just look at photos of WW2 fighters. Many of the fighters used by both sides had different looks comparing the early model of an aircraft to the late model of the same aircraft.

Edited by zathras23

I actually had no problem with the Giraffe Destroyers. But then I decided to "fix" the image, and after seeing it "fixed" the Giraffe -class just look silly now.

FHXN2dT.jpg

Edited by TIE Pilot

Actually I don't have a problem with the ISD look. The one shown in Rebels is at least 5 years older than the ones we're familiar with from the movies. The way I look at it is the newer models have either 1: had a refit or 2: a redesign to the newer look.

That's a good way to rationalize it, and since the EU is gone, the earlier explanation of the difference between the Devastator from ANH model and the Avenger model from ESB, is no longer canon.

I just wish that that earlier material hadn't been purged just in order to stick to the McQuarrie imagery over and above the movie versions of things. I just don't see the added value.

Unless I'm reading this wrong I don't see any point in rationalizing the proportions of ships in SW:Rebels. Its a stylistic choice made by the creators of the animated TV series. Is that so hard to understand? Any argument for or against it is subject only to personal taste, not whether its consistent with canon measurements.

That being said I don't hate them but neither do I like them. The Ghost though looks like a sweet ship but I was initially surprised by how large it is compared to the Gozanti.

Actually, I prefer photoshopped-un-giraffed.

Those things are really gonna be Giraffe class.