This is another one of those "I want to say this happened, but I'm not sure believably, or maybe mechanically, that it would be feasible." Here are some:
So, Aedan is the RT in this example, and I am thinking of statting him up, for kicks. I am shooting for something like RT --> Swashbuckler --> Cal Privateer.
- I want Aedan to be a sword-and-pistol sort of fighter, full of panache and bluster. Does he need both, or do they do enough of the same things. I have HA and ItS, so it's more of an opinion thing.
- If I go Swashbuckler, Aedan's Dynasty gets to stop being chummy with the Navy. I can EASILY explain this; maybe his foolish demeanor set them wrong, maybe he challenged a Navy Captain, or picked up an Admiral's daughter at a big saree; it's easy enough to explain, and if he's a Privateer, they might also look negatively on him for that (fortunately, his father was the original recipient of the LoM). However, the Exalted Wyrm is packing torpedoes, and while I'm on accepting that they don't get "War Asset" to their Acq test, if the Navy doesn't like him, who is he buying Navy weapons from? Is the -10 really going to slow him down, or are decent torps still easy enough to find?
- I see the Swashbuckler and CPriv doubling up on some stuff, but, of course, I rather like the Combat Flair talent. Would it be doable to EA the talent, and maybe skip the ACP, or should I say "for Alternate Career talents, you MUST be in it, even if the talent's prerequisites don't say so, more or less?" I think I could live with the -10, but if Swashbuckler is similar enough to CPriv, and the cool talent from swash is maybe a good EA, then I could skip getting to Alternate Careers.
Okay, done babbling for now. Looking forward to thoughts, and have a good one.
Edited by venkelos