I too am going to say no to the sympathizer cards for the reasons already mentioned. These would be a giant balancing problem...

make them unique.. only one per side.. could be fun

I too am going to say no to the sympathizer cards for the reasons already mentioned. These would be a giant balancing problem...

make them unique.. only one per side.. could be fun

unique or not they would still need to make sure it balances out right. I figure three distinct factions with some upgrade overlap will be hard enough for them to keep balanced.

No no no no! You guys have got it all wrong. It's:

AAY'HAN!

AAY'HAN!

AAY'HAN!

AAY'HAN!

Cthulu?

What about Cthulu? Aay'han is most certainly not in Cthulu.

I think it's a pretty ugly ship personally.

Me too, its ugly and as far as I can tell a bit of a dumb design for a ship.

I think the time might come where they can actually just design their own ships for the game, or ask someone at Disney to do the same. That would make more sense and we get to see something new, remember that? when things were good because they were new?

I don't think this would be "very good" for the game system itself. It could partially cancel having a third faction

i.e. the WH40k 6th edition effect "everyone can be an ally to everyone"

Wrong. Now if you are talking about 7th edition then maybe. Still with restrictions though.

I think it's a pretty ugly ship personally.

Also, not part of the rebellion era but before so...

I was not familiar with Hound's Tooth before this. Maybe it is great from what ever story it comes from, but. . . It is ugly.

I was not familiar with Hound's Tooth before this. Maybe it is great from what ever story it comes from, but. . . It is ugly.

It is ugly... but it is Bossk's ship so, we need it anyway!