"Just have faith—it is not forgotten!"

@16:10

Yup!

I just watched this one and included it in my Gen Con articles.

It is a must watch gang... if you love STAR WARS X-WING.

at the risk of repeating myself - and speculating somewhat - he gives a bit of a hint as to how that might be done about 7 seconds later

"Just have faith—it is not forgotten!"

@16:10

They basically said what I wa saying in another forum, theres many ways to fix the TIE Advanced but they have a set theme for the ship and how they will fix it will be unique yet still fit that theme.

That video is awesome! I like super need that Interceptor Turret upgrade.

Nice interview. Seem like good guys.

Lots of goodies in there.

-titles are a preferred way of bringing weaker ships up to snuff

- an anti turret card is on the way

- we can expect more love for the original star wars iconic ships, they are consjdered a very crucial part of the game

- one of the lead designers has a trendy haircut

Frank is a LOT YOUNGER than I pictured! Seeing him in the video answered a LOT of questions for me. I'd say he doesn't come from a historical wargaming background, and with all their talk about Magic and other "trendy" games, historical rules are not what they use as a basis.

Frank is a LOT YOUNGER than I pictured! Seeing him in the video answered a LOT of questions for me. I'd say he doesn't come from a historical wargaming background, and with all their talk about Magic and other "trendy" games, historical rules are not what they use as a basis.

They're not the original designers though. I'm not sure of the age of the original designer, but I think it's a fantastic rule set, that I believe is based off Wings of War.

Great video for sure, but did it really a second thread dedicated to it? Multiple common threads seems to be a pattern around here as of late.

Frank is a LOT YOUNGER than I pictured! Seeing him in the video answered a LOT of questions for me. I'd say he doesn't come from a historical wargaming background, and with all their talk about Magic and other "trendy" games, historical rules are not what they use as a basis.

Great video for sure, but did it really a second thread dedicated to it? Multiple common threads seems to be a pattern around here as of late.

If I gave one or more ***** about the inconvenience you face having to encounter a single topic of discussion more than once, or if I shared the goal of making your time spent here more efficient, I'd point out apologetically that I was not aware of (and still unable to find) the first thread that was dedicated to the topic.

As it stands, though, the number of ***** that I give is perilously close to zero.