60% greater than 40 is 64. 60% less than 100 is 40. I can't help it math works differently than you think it does.60% of $40 is $24.But I don't see 60% greater value...enough for ME to guarantee I will pop in and buy two core sets on release.
Or 60% of $100 is $60 which is the price difference. So how ever you want to try and do the math, if it is Armada costing 250% of X-wing; or X-Wing costs 40% of Armada ergo that game should contains 60% greater value---The bottom line is Armada is expensive and I do not see the greater cost represented in the gameplay and box content.
Oh, and you can't do basic applied math.
But this is great, I will now say Armada clearly isn't worth 250% of X-Wing because that number gets attention.
However, you are correct that 100 is 250% as much as 40*, so yes, you should probably stick with that explanation.
*Not to be confused with 250% more, which would be 140.
What I was originally saying, is once Armada is hypothetically opened, and I were to look at all the contents...I would probably react noticing, "Huh, it seems like I am not getting a full $100 value here. I paid less than half is this for X-Wing (40%) and with Armada...I don't see the value of that extra $60 I spent (60%) represented in the box content." I don't see that value now, therefore, I will not jump in and buy two core sets.
Dollar for dollar, X-Wing has amazing value.