My opinion is that it's contextual.
You should value your own likes and your own opinions more my fine Math-Winger.
Okay lets see if I can wring an answer out of you that is contextual to this topic... I need to trick it out of you.
In your Rebel Ship Collection which Official FFG X-Wing Model do you own the most of?
NUMBER!
_________
It's not mathwing, it's basic evaluation methodology, which is inherited from the fundamental logic of systematic inquiry. You can't say "this is the best X" without first figuring out what important criteria differentiate various Xs from one another.
And because in this game those criteria are context-dependent, the answer to the question is necessarily context-dependent. The ship with the heaviest defense is not the same as the ship with the best defensive efficiency, and neither one necessarily has the best offense, and in a particular list or against a particular kind of threat, any of them might be the best.
The flippant answer of "CR-90" is relevant here, and so is the response that a Phantom might be able to kill a CR-90: the CR-90 does some things very well, and because it's so damned expensive it does them better than most other ships. One of the things it doesn't do very well, though, is fine placement of firing arcs. So the CR-90 is the best Rebel ship in some important respects, but if you constrain the answer to naked and/or generic ships and include "can feasibly go toe-to-toe with a Phantom" as one of the criteria, it slips off the list.
Do you just have fun with this game... can you have fun?
![]()