Sauce?
If you added a non-Star Wars ship to the game...
Cylon Base Star.
Ship from Starflight.
Enterprise can't kill an ISD, it takes two and one has to have Kirk.Proof,http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=PVX_5sWi6b0My votehttp://hqwallbase.com/images/big/stargate_digital_art_planets_science_fiction_spaceships_wallpaper-26103.jpg
I call that BS. An ISD had trouble hitting the back of the tantive let alone trying to hit any star fleet vessel!!
**** even an obirth class science vessel could take down an ISD, full impulse to get below then let off some Photon torps and its all over.
The massed Ties could be a threat but not the slow turning, slow firing turbo laser turrets not to mention how slow the projectile seems to move.
Well, it would only take one hit for the ISD and I am not sure if anything Star Fleet has could get enough force through ISD sheilding to do significant damage. Enterprise D phasers are said to clock in at about 4 GW. Slave-1 blasters are listed as 64,000 GW (which is stupid and nonsensical), and I am pretty sure an ISD can take a couple hits from Slave-1 and has better guns itself.
Star Trek is still better though 
.
Well, it would only take one hit for the ISD and I am not sure if anything Star Fleet has could get enough force through ISD sheilding to do significant damage. Enterprise D phasers are said to clock in at about 4 GW. Slave-1 blasters are listed as 64,000 GW (which is stupid and nonsensical), and I am pretty sure an ISD can take a couple hits from Slave-1 and has better guns itself.Enterprise can't kill an ISD, it takes two and one has to have Kirk.Proof,http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=PVX_5sWi6b0My votehttp://hqwallbase.com/images/big/stargate_digital_art_planets_science_fiction_spaceships_wallpaper-26103.jpg
I call that BS. An ISD had trouble hitting the back of the tantive let alone trying to hit any star fleet vessel!!
**** even an obirth class science vessel could take down an ISD, full impulse to get below then let off some Photon torps and its all over.
The massed Ties could be a threat but not the slow turning, slow firing turbo laser turrets not to mention how slow the projectile seems to move.
Star Trek is still better though
Heart of Gold.
The Heart of Gold is 150 metres long. It is shaped like a running shoe, and it is generally rather white. - THAT ISN'T RIGHT. BLOODY HOLLYWOOD.
aaaaand rant over.
HEYYYYY!!!!!
I was going to make that rant!
Maybe it IS a running shoe for a species of aliens with rather bulbous feet...
Heart of Gold.
The Heart of Gold is 150 metres long. It is shaped like a running shoe, and it is generally rather white. - THAT ISN'T RIGHT. BLOODY HOLLYWOOD.
aaaaand rant over.
HEYYYYY!!!!!
I was going to make that rant!
Maybe it IS a running shoe for a species of aliens with rather bulbous feet...
That is improbable.
another classic. sorry i can't resist..
queen: Flash... oaaaahaa... savior of the universe!
on a serious note:
just kidding. red dwarf is not a serious show, it's hilarious!
Edit: forgot stats.. for gordon i'd say 4111.. the dwarf: 0088.
Edited by oddeyeMaybe this one...?
....nah, you're right. Totally out of place.
Maybe this one...?
....nah, you're right. Totally out of place.
[Force choke]
Anybody else remember this one?
Maybe this one...?
....nah, you're right. Totally out of place.
[Force choke]
I know, I should never have mentioned that abomination.
It's not a starfighter, it's a pointy fried egg.
It
Maybe this one...?
....nah, you're right. Totally out of place.
[Force choke]
I know, I should never have mentioned that abomination.
It's not a starfighter, it's a pointy fried egg.
It's the love child of a speed boat and a (vomit in mouth) ... pod racer (eeearrrllllll....) ....
Oh...the Hawk from Space 1999.
Sky One Interceptor from UFO.
Planet killer from ST: ToS "Doomsday Machine" though there'd be scale issues...
That said...I also agree that B5 would be a glorious match-up. I would like to submit the Mark 2 SA-23 Mitchell-Hyundyne Starfury for your consideration.
I won't join the debate of ST v. SW. Because the winner is whomever the writer wants. Even each universe's canon contradicts itself. 
It
Maybe this one...?
....nah, you're right. Totally out of place.
[Force choke]
I know, I should never have mentioned that abomination.
It's not a starfighter, it's a pointy fried egg.
It's the love child of a speed boat and a (vomit in mouth) ... pod racer (eeearrrllllll....) ....
It's Big Bird's Fun Kids Ride! YAY!!!! Stupid is CooL!
allow it to carry crew, including
Stupid and nonsensical, or from a time period many thousands of years more advanced than Star Trek. Pretty sure it's the second.
Well, it would only take one hit for the ISD and I am not sure if anything Star Fleet has could get enough force through ISD sheilding to do significant damage. Enterprise D phasers are said to clock in at about 4 GW. Slave-1 blasters are listed as 64,000 GW (which is stupid and nonsensical), and I am pretty sure an ISD can take a couple hits from Slave-1 and has better guns itself.
Enterprise can't kill an ISD, it takes two and one has to have Kirk.Proof,http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=PVX_5sWi6b0My votehttp://hqwallbase.com/images/big/stargate_digital_art_planets_science_fiction_spaceships_wallpaper-26103.jpg
I call that BS. An ISD had trouble hitting the back of the tantive let alone trying to hit any star fleet vessel!!
**** even an obirth class science vessel could take down an ISD, full impulse to get below then let off some Photon torps and its all over.
The massed Ties could be a threat but not the slow turning, slow firing turbo laser turrets not to mention how slow the projectile seems to move.
Star Trek is still better though
I agree it's stupid an nonsensical, 64 TW is the more power than the Earth produces in heat at it's core.
The numbers that they throw around on both sides, by creators of the series and the fans, are nonsensical,
but fanatical star wars fans have the most biased calculations I've seen. And that Slave I figure a good example.
.
Not exactly a space ship but more versatile than a fighter. Without all the weird veritech need to turn into an F14
Can't get a pic to post but how about a Protoss Carrier from StarCraft....endless drones...eternal swarm now I only I can find more vespene gas....
Can't get a pic to post but how about a Protoss Carrier from StarCraft....endless drones...eternal swarm now I only I can find more vespene gas....
Definitely the convertible from Heavy Metal. Anyone know what kind of car it was?
Two words: Wing Commander
73 Confed and allied fighters, 65 Kilrathi and enemy fighters, and I am not even going to start counting the number of Large craft in those games. You can have red-shirts and named pilots for every group. In addition to each ship having a number of special abilities only on that one ship.
Stupid and nonsensical, or from a time period many thousands of years more advanced than Star Trek. Pretty sure it's the second.
Well, it would only take one hit for the ISD and I am not sure if anything Star Fleet has could get enough force through ISD sheilding to do significant damage. Enterprise D phasers are said to clock in at about 4 GW. Slave-1 blasters are listed as 64,000 GW (which is stupid and nonsensical), and I am pretty sure an ISD can take a couple hits from Slave-1 and has better guns itself.
Enterprise can't kill an ISD, it takes two and one has to have Kirk.Proof,http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=PVX_5sWi6b0My votehttp://hqwallbase.com/images/big/stargate_digital_art_planets_science_fiction_spaceships_wallpaper-26103.jpg
I call that BS. An ISD had trouble hitting the back of the tantive let alone trying to hit any star fleet vessel!!
**** even an obirth class science vessel could take down an ISD, full impulse to get below then let off some Photon torps and its all over.
The massed Ties could be a threat but not the slow turning, slow firing turbo laser turrets not to mention how slow the projectile seems to move.
Star Trek is still better though
I agree it's stupid an nonsensical, 64 TW is the more power than the Earth produces in heat at it's core.
The numbers that they throw around on both sides, by creators of the series and the fans, are nonsensical,
but fanatical star wars fans have the most biased calculations I've seen. And that Slave I figure a good example.
.
The thing is, that Slave-1 reading is not fan made, it was printed in an official book detailing the stats of many SW ships. It could be argued that given GWs are measured over the course of a second, and Slave-1 does not fire continuous shots, it's power per shot is lower. It's stated Rof is 480 RPM or 8 RPS. This would bring its power output per shot down to 8,000 GW. Still obscene and inconsistent given the damage it is shown to do to small asteroids.
Wait for it....
I have got to get me one of these!