I still think more low threat heroes is a good thing, as long as they are not Glorfindels, but have the right stats and modest abilities for their threat cost. This is not overpowered, but simply gives more deck building options, not just for Secrecy, but in general.

Yes I also think Glorifindel is really bad design hero.To much powerful and very stupid way. But for solo and for secrecy he is good. Wny he didn have a text : Setup: if you control 2 more heroes other then Him remove Glorifindel from play.

So as a pure Secrecy hero he can be ok.

Because he is not that powerful to have such ridiculous text.

Here is a house rule that I have been pondering for Secrecy decks. If your starting threat is less than 20 and you control less than three heroes, your minimum deck size is 40 cards. So you can get a decent boon for choosing to play with only 2 heroes with a low starting threat and a lower deck size increasing your chances of seeing the good secrecy cards sooner.

I still think more low threat heroes is a good thing, as long as they are not Glorfindels, but have the right stats and modest abilities for their threat cost. This is not overpowered, but simply gives more deck building options, not just for Secrecy, but in general.

Yes I also think Glorifindel is really bad design hero.To much powerful and very stupid way. But for solo and for secrecy he is good. Wny he didn have a text : Setup: if you control 2 more heroes other then Him remove Glorifindel from play.

So as a pure Secrecy hero he can be ok.

That's a worthwhile wording to keep in mind if they ever want to make a hero that's purely for secrecy.