Westeros Bannerman,

For those who are familiar with the Arkham Horror forum, you know Tibs compiled thousands of games and continues to provide all manner of statistical information. I don't see it readily available here, but was curious if anyone has picked up the task in this forum for AGoT ?

Cheers,

Joe

I have been keeping this, for [63] games now, it's not very detailed though:

Thanks, SFRR!

I didn't realize Greyjoy was so powerful. Okay, so only the first grouping "Victories by House" makes sense to me as it's a series of 6-player games and there are 6 Houses represented...the other ones, not so much. Can you provide a bit more fidelity?

The stats are interesting, comparing victories to eliminations (V/E)

Greyjoy: 16/7

Baratheon: 14/0

Stark: 6/1

Lannister: 8/11

Tyrell: 11/1

Martell: 8/2

Baratheon seems like a run-away leader on the board with zero eliminations, followed by Tyrell with 11 victories and 1 elimination.

Cheers,

Joe

Joe, it is incongruent, so to speak, to compare victories and eliminations by House, if comparing differing game set-ups.

In the 5p Variant (NO GJ), Lannister is awesome.

In 4p RAW ("Rules-as-Written"), Baratheon has won every game I have observed, played in, or GM'd.

The 4p Variant we have played, actually we have played 2 different versions, but I forgot to tally the results: Lanni is quite good, everyone else is equivalent. We have played TL, Lanni, Stark, Bara; we have also played Marty, Lanni, Stark, Bara. Either one is much better than the "out-of-the-box" RAW set-up which overwhelmingly favors the Bara player.

The T6 Rules (tournament 6-player) are the only way we play whenever we play FtF ("Face-to-Face"). The T6 Rules may be found here:

http://boardgamegeek.com/filepage/97270/t6-rules-for-6p-7p-agot

The 7p PoD ("Print-on-Demand") game is fan-created, I borrowed a lot of material from some Russian guys who play 7p all the time (like 5-6 times per month), it works very well.

SFRR,

Thanks ~ yes, it's quite incongruent, but I was trying to figure out how you were using the victories and eliminations. I appreciate your additional information as it puts the other data in perspective.

Cheers,

Joe

SFRR,

Thanks ~ yes, it's quite incongruent, but I was trying to figure out how you were using the victories and eliminations. I appreciate your additional information as it puts the other data in perspective.

Cheers,

Joe

Yeah, it's just kind of "raw data"...if I had started from the beginning keeping track of eliminations by games with varying #'s of players / set-up's...it would be much better. I can only say "non-scientifically" that virtually all of the player eliminations that I have recorded are from 6p RAW games...ugghhh <sigh>