about the reversal step:

1. do cards played as a reversal(without the reversal keyword themselves) still technically play the reversal R:. as in can they be negated? AKA does Astrid reversal no matter what

2. the rules say if the reversal R: on one attack is negated then the reversal step ends. does this mean that only 1 reversal may be attempted per blocked attack. as in previous rulings about being able to play another reversal from your hand being undone.

3. it states that an attack has an Enhance, block, damage AND reversal step. does the attack itself resolve before or after a reversal if one is played?

3 might make some people sad if its true

1. We'll figure that one out soon.

2. Yup, negating reversal is now actually a meaningful act. You don't get to try again.

3. Reversal is still a response to an attack resolving. The reversal step is just there for the reversal to be played, it's sorta a transitional step. Once the reversal is played, the attack is done resolving and you move directly into resolving the reversal.

Tagrineth said:

I really like this sentence, Tag. I think it was the clearest way to state the purpose of the reversal step, and crystalized timing nicely. Thanks.