Rexler: in order to use his ability, you have to focus, not spend it on attack (so you're main attack has to roll well), also not save it for defense, the target can't have shields left, and you take a ~50/50 chance of it pulling an ineffectual crit. Sounds extremely close to saboteur to me (and we know how often that gets used). Granted, if two hits go onto hull (or you hit Chewy), then it could be worth it. I just don't see his ability being used more than once a game.
Unlike Saboteur, it's not costing you 2 points and taking up a valuable crew slot; unlike Saboteur, it doesn't have a 50/50 chance of working; unlike Saboteur, it can apply to multiple damage cards; unlike Saboteur, the action you take is flexible (you can spend your focus token to modify your roll, spend it to change hits to crits, or keep it for defense).
Obviously his usefulness is bounded by the general usefulness of crit-fishing, but it's the best crit-fishing ability in the game by a long shot.
Vessery: thankfully not as bad as Rexler. However, you have to have another ship TL the same target Vessery is going to attack, and ideally one with a PS of 6 or less since usually you want to use your TL on the attack. Although that doesn't sound as hard, you still have to have other ships that can TL. Which is either a firespray (pretty much a 3 ship list), a bomber (which has its own problems with getting TL reliably against high PS), or the shuttle (probably the best bet with say weapons engineer, but can't joust which is what the Defender is doing). Thankfully, the wording allows you to spend the TL to immediately re-roll your current attack.
So the requirement to get a full extra action out of Vessery, every round, with no stress, is that you include a ship on PS1-6 with the target lock ability. That means a Firespray, Defender, Bomber, Lambda (potentially with the ST-321 title, which completely eliminates PS/TL issues), TIE Advanced (yeah, I know), TIE Fighter + Targeting Computer, or TIE Interceptor + Targeting Computer.
I don't see that as a huge limitation.
![]()
I suppose you're right Vorpal, I just keep seeing the price tag on these guys, and needing the synergy to make them work well...the cost is starting to make my head hurt >_<